Minor Approval Process

Phase I: Initial Program Proposal

Normally new minor proposals begin in an academic unit of the campus, i.e., from a department. In some circumstances, suggestions for new minors may arise from campus constituencies not connected with a particular department. The initial program proposal should include a rationale, need and demand for the program, and a brief description.

Phase II: Review by Dean

Prior to full development of a proposal, the appropriate Dean (or Deans in the case of cross-disciplinary minors) will review the initial proposal, considering whether the proposed minor is consistent with the mission of the college and can be reasonably supported with resources. Preliminary program approval by the Dean signals the department to begin a more thorough development of the minor.

Phase III: Development of Full Proposal

Full proposal includes a detailed outline of the curriculum, and any needed resources such as:

        1.      faculty and support of instruction

        2.      library resources

        3.      equipment, laboratory support, computer support

        4.      facilities

Phase IV: School Curriculum Committee and Governance

The proposal is submitted to the school curriculum committee. If recommended by the school committee, the minor is submitted to the Steering Committee to be forwarded to the Committee on Academic Programs for its review and recommendation, according to the steps of the Governance Process.

Phase V: Final Approval

As completion of the Governance Process, the provost will grant final approval of the minor ensuring that it is consistent with the mission of the college and can be supported with current resources. Upon approval, the Academic Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees is notified.

---

Recommended by CAP: 2001
Approved by Board of Trustees: 3/7/02
Revised by Steering: 1/27/06