I. Performance-based Multiple Range Adjustments for Faculty MOA 51In order to avoid confusion and misunderstanding about the Faculty Range Adjustment Program, it is important that the program's criteria be clear. As stated in the agreement signed by The College and Local 2364, faculty range adjustments recognize:
Applicants must "provide compelling evidence of a record of sustained meritorious work performance and achievement." in order to be awarded a range adjustment. In keeping with the Career Development Assessment Process, applicants need to engage in a thorough and in-depth process of self-reflection. Applicants should present various kinds of evidence to demonstrate that their contributions are indeed exceptional, above and beyond the normal expectations. In particular, applicants should reflect on their teaching in light of peer evaluations and student evaluations. (A summary of student evaluations from the three most recent years should be submitted along with the forms themselves.) Applicants should submit syllabi and other instructional materials and copies of their recent scholarly contributions. They should discuss the significance of their contributions to the intellectual and/or residential life of the campus community."sustained meritorious work performance and exceptional contributions to The College of New Jersey general campus community. …Meritorious work performance in this context shall be defined as exceptional accomplishment above and beyond the normal requirements and expectations associated with the candidate’s rank as referenced in The College’s promotions criteria."
Step Date Activity 1 Mar 7 Faculty member provides written notification to chair or dean
(School of Nursing) of intention to submit application in order to
ensure Assessment Committee (AC) is constituted.2 Mar 21 Deadline for submission of application to department or school
(Business and Nursing) AC.3 Mar 28 Applicant informed of composition of AC 4 Apr 4 Applicant notifies department chair or dean ( School of
Nursing) in writing of concerns about composition of AC.5 Apr 11 Resolution of concerns over composition of AC 6 Apr 25 Report of AC submitted to dean and applicant 7 May 2 Deadline for written response by applicant to AC report 8 May 9 Recommendation of dean submitted to provost and applicant 9 May 14 Deadline for written response by applicant to dean’s recommendation 10 May 23 Recommendation of provost to president and applicant 11 May 30 Deadline for a written response by applicant to provost’s
recommendation12 Jun 13 Applicant notified of decision by president