|




|
When I first learned that we were going to have to
videotape ourselves teaching, I was very nervous. On some level, I knew that
viewing this videotape was going to mean I’d have to change some aspects of my
teaching, and I wasn’t entirely ready for that. However, I did not expect that
viewing this tape was going to be so incredibly helpful. By videotaping myself
and analyzing it afterwards, I was placed in the shoes of my students. I
imagined how I would feel if I was a student in my own classroom. Though
this way of viewing myself was not the most flattering or complimentary, it
provided great insight on what I need to improve to become a more effective
teacher.
For the most part, I
met all my learning objectives in the lesson. My main learning objectives were
that the students would identify the characters’ motivations and development in
the play, and describe the events that took place in Act 1, Scenes 1 & 2. The
first learning objective was achieved in several places in the lesson. By
evaluating previous predictions made the day before, students were able to begin
to understand different qualities and traits of the characters. This activity
not only provided a basis for future discussion regarding the characters, but it
also will help the students gain insight into why a character might behave as
certain way later in the play. In addition, students discussed character
motivation and development toward the end of the lesson when they discussed the
influence of Hal on Falstaff (and vice versa), and Hal on King Henry (and vice
versa). The second learning objective was also met in the lesson during the
“Somebody Wanted But So” activity and during the word play activity. In the
“Somebody Wanted But So,” students were asked to summarize events in the play in
one sentence. In the word play activity, students looked at different ways that
Shakespeare uses words to convey his meaning. This activity involved both
learning objectives; in the conversation regarding the context of the word play
activity, the students needed to summarize the events that took place in Scene
2, and in doing so, they were able to see the relationship between Hal and
Falstaff and how it affects each one’s character.
I think I could have
done a better job of transitioning between activities in this lesson. Many
times, I would end an activity and move on to the next by saying “Okay, now we
are…” I feel like beginning the direction with a word like, “okay” was not a
professional way of speaking, and contributed to the lack of authority I had
with my students throughout the lesson. Many times, transitions were rocky and
did not seem to correlate with the activity before it, excepting the
“influences” activity that took place after the word play small group
discussion. The transition between the small group work and class discussion in
the word play activity did not go well at all. One group was finished long
before the other one, and therefore the group members were sitting doing nothing
for ten minutes while waiting for the other group to finish. I did not handle
this well as a teacher. I think that this was partly because I was afraid that
if I did not give the one group enough time to look at the passage and answer
their questions, they wouldn’t get the material. I also think it was partly
because I was worried that my lesson would not take up the whole class period.
However, as a teacher, I should have given the group that had finished early
something to do in the meantime, perhaps read the next scene of Henry IV
aloud together, or brainstorm questions that they could ask the other group. I
should have also limited the amount of time the second group had to work. I felt
that the transition between the word play activity and the “influences” activity
did go well, however, because the two topics were related. We moved from
describing elements of Hal and Falstaff’s relationship to discussing the
influences between Hal and Falstaff and Hal and his father. While I did have
enough time to close the lesson, I did not ask the questions I had prepared
beforehand to assess student understanding. Instead, I reiterated what the
homework was, and reminded them that their questions were due the next day. In
retrospect, I should have asked the questions I prepared because they would have
been a good indicator of how much the students learned in the lesson.
I think that the
reason I didn’t ask the questions at the end of the period stems from my lack of
confidence in myself in asking the questions. I believe that my questioning
techniques are most likely the weakest part of my lesson. Firstly, my voice
intonation when asking questions is completely wrong and often misleading to the
students. When I asked a question, my voice took on an almost apologetic tone,
which could have resulted in the students deciding not to participate. I would
also begin questions with the words “Do you think…” While this type of question
might be good some of the time, when it is used all of the time, it makes the
question very weak. I need to be more direct with my level of questioning.
While I felt like I used sufficient wait time while teaching, when I was viewing
the videotape, I only actually waited for a couple seconds before giving them
the answer. This was especially apparent when we were evaluating predictions. I
asked the class a question, waited 3 seconds, and then told them where they
could find the answer. This not only was an insufficient amount of time to fully
answer the question, but also communicated to the students that they did not
need to participate- that if they chose not to answer questions, I would just
give them the answer. I feel like my strength in questioning is that I develop
good and well thought out questions ahead of time, and integrate them well into
my unit. However, my weaknesses lie in my voice intonation while asking the
questions, coming up with good follow-up questions, and asking leading
questions. Often, I would ask a question with a specific answer in mind;
therefore, when a student would say something unexpected, I would become
flustered and not know how to respond. While I feel like my initial questions
are good, after I received the student’s response, I often did not follow-up
with a strong question that would enhance their learning.
While I didn’t have
any specific problems with classroom management, I think this was more due to
the fact that the class size was so small (six students that day) than anything
I did as a teacher. I would say that the overall climate of my classroom was
fine, although perhaps a little boring. One issue of classroom management that I
definitely should have addressed was when one student got up and left the
classroom without telling me. One of the other students even noted it, asking,
“Did he just get up and leave?” What I should have done was realized he was
leaving the classroom and stopped him beforehand, or at least ran out after him
to see where he was going. This was a huge mistake that I realized right away,
but still didn’t do anything about. I think part of the reason this occurred was
because I wanted to be accepted or liked by the students. The student who left
was an influential student in the classroom, if not the class leader than very
close, and looking back, I think that on some level I was afraid that if I stood
against him, the class would turn on me. I know that that is not the stance a
teacher should take, and I need to get over this fear that the students won’t
like me. I think this fear really impacted the effectiveness of my teaching in
many ways, but especially in this instance of classroom management.
In terms of
organization with classroom routines, I think I was pretty well prepared. I had
all the handouts and materials ready and waiting. However, I think I definitely
needed to be clearer in the area of giving directions. I knew what I needed to
say, but I think my nervousness affected the way I gave directions, and this
distracted the students from receiving the whole message. My directions were
full of “ums” and other fillers that make it difficult to discern what I’m
actually saying. I don’t think this stems from not having prepared what I was
going to say, but rather from nervousness that makes me forget what I was going
to say. I would also often start saying one thing, then change my mind and
phrase it a different way. While this might make sense to me in my head,
watching it on the videotape indicated that it made my directions very unclear
and confusing. I will say, however, that my directions became more clear toward
the end of the lesson, when I was explaining what they needed to do for the
“influences” activity and when I was telling them what they needed to do for
homework the next day. However, there still is a lot of work I need to do in the
area of communication.
Good communication is
key for an effective classroom. I feel like a lot of my problems with
communication have to do with my voice, as well as the level of nervousness that
I’m feeling at the time. My voice throughout most of the lesson was way too
soft. When compared with some of the students, it was incredible how low my
voice really was. Usually when I was reading from the text or got excited about
something, my voice would become stronger and louder; it was when I was asking
questions, giving directions, and giving feedback that my voice lacked strength
and volume. By taking control of my voice and making it louder and stronger, I
will have a more demanding presence in the classroom, where students will want
to pay attention and listen to me. Some of my idiosyncrasies also played a part
in my inability to establish a presence in the classroom. For example, I noticed
I have a tendency to bite my lip. This conveys a sense of nervousness or
uncertainty, which is not good in a classroom where the students trust you to
teach them. I also not only had an apologetic tone to my voice when asking
questions, but I even apologized to one student when she got an answer wrong!
Finally, I also had a tendency to turn my back to the class when writing on the
board. Biting my lip is a habit that I will have to stop in order to communicate
a sense of authority in the classroom. The apologetic intonation in my voice, as
well as my voice level, is something that I will need to work on in the coming
weeks and during student teaching, especially because I didn’t even know that my
voice sounded like that. Finally, I can stop turning my back to the class by
either trying to write sideways, or asking the students a question that they can
be thinking about or answering while I am writing on the board.
This lesson was
definitely not one of the best lessons I taught. By watching it on the
videotape, I was a little discouraged, but also very enlightened, especially
because many of the things I didn’t even realize I did. I think the major issue
that will need to be overcome when I become a teacher is my insecurity regarding
whether the students will like me or not. In my own experience, there have been
teachers that I didn’t like very much, but they were extremely effective in
helping me learn the material. While this does not mean that I should be a
strict and angry teacher all the time, it does mean that I shouldn’t be afraid
of making the students do things they necessarily will not like. I think that if
I overcome this insecurity, then the rest of my issues with teaching, namely my
voice level and overall communication style, will become more effective on a
whole.
|