|
Abstract "Human cloning may be the most difficult moral dilemma
posed by science since the splitting of the atom" (Powers, 1998,
p. 58). In February of 1997, two figures were added to daily life: Dolly,
a cloned sheep, and her maker, Scottish scientist Ian Wilmut. Their
story could be found in newspapers, on television, across the Internet,
and in conversations. Since the ability to clone humans has become a
reality, there has been a media frenzy sparking many a debate among
a variety of publics: scientists, lawyers, ethicists, religious leaders,
government representatives and others. The newspaper coverage of human cloning varied as predicted; the Coefficients of Imbalance ranged from +.0872 to -.2672 revealing diverging opinions among city newspapers. The most significant correlations and regression findings revealed strong nationwide links between three hypotheses cluster groups, Buffer (% professionals), Vulnerability (% below poverty level and % unemployed) and Media Access (number of FM and AM radio stations). Together, these three cluster groups account for 59.9 percent of the variance -- and more favorable (or less unfavorable) news coverage of human cloning. Each of the these findings confirms previous research suggesting a broad relation between proportion of relatively privileged or "buffered" groups within a city, the proportion of un-buffered or "vulnerable" groups in a city and media access (FM and AM radio stations), and newspaper reporting. Also supported here is the relationship between buffered groups and greater media access with positive coverage of social change issues, while a higher proportion of vulnerable groups is associated with negative reporting. |