How Dr. Ron grades
I am trying harder these days to leave my students with no doubt about how I grade their work. I have written before about grading blogs, but I have to consider other works, in particular the business plans they are required to write in small groups. The TCNJ Writing Program has a grading rubric that each of us more-or-less works with, but it has two problems from my point of view:- It's too long.
- It doesn't say anything about how much weight is given to what area of writing.
| Aspect | % Weight | Grades | |||
| A | B | C | D | ||
| Claim: compelling, specific, debatable | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Logic: developed, organized | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Audience: considered | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Evidence: reliable, persuasive | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Citations: correctly cited and sufficient in number | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Grammar | 15 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
| Word Choice | 10 | excellent | good | fair | poor |
Labels: education





Site Feed





0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home