Does TCNJers follow the history of Usenet?
Comparing the history of TCNJers to a history of Usenet groups such as sci.engr (greatly accelerated):- we start with the original group, small but committed
- discussion topics start out specific but gravitate to general, except for ads for meetings that may or may not be of general interest
- good discussions bring in more users
- occasional announcements from those who drop in just to make them
- flame wars break out but are quashed by those who want a nice group, and occasionally by group veterans who are trying to maintain a vision
- as the group grows, those interested in specific discussions break out into other groups, keeping the participation in the original group close to constant
- but most of the thoughtful people break out into the other groups
- and the original group is gradually dominated by a few "personalities" with spam on their mind or axes to grind
- the remaining thoughtful people are chased off by flame wars
- the original group becomes a polluted sandbox dominated by spam and the pronouncements of the personalities
My former student Mary Anne, who's responsible for forming TCNJers, I don't think ever dreamed that she'd have a community of more than 150. On a campus of 6000, where many students are far from activist, this is significant. Some of the subscribers are potential students; a few are alumni; some participants claim their parents even occasionally look in. (Heaven forfend!) I would consider this a classic example of word-of-mouth marketing, as Usenet once was.
Labels: internet





Site Feed





0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home