|
Rhetoric is the study of persuasion, of dealing with
controversial issues. An argument involves two (or
more) conflicting assertions, and an attempt to
resolve them through an appeal to reason. When you
try to persuade others, there will almost always be
someone to disagree with you, and loudly, no matter
how sensitive you are, and how orthodox your opinion.
You have to be ready to accept some conflict and deal
with it constructively.
Unfortunately, nobody escapes from workplace conflict.
I have gore stories to tell from conflicts I've been in,
and nearly everyone faces the same trials at one point
or another. Two co-workers misunderstand each other,
and instead of seeking clarification they raise their
voices, and everything goes downhill from there.
Here are typical sources of workplace conflict:
- Priorities. Usually between a regular
employee and line or project management, two parties
don't share the same understanding of which tasks should
be done in which order. This also includes:
- differences in priority or style
- perceived interference in work
- unclear or inconsistent decision-making authority
- unclear or inconsistent reasoning behind decisions
or policy
- Performance. A regular employee finds
out about performance problems through a negative formal
evaluation, or even a layoff, and is not given a chance
for correction.
- Principles. Two employees can find
ample cause for conflict in discussions of politics
(even office politics), religion, and ethics. Once
the conflict begins, it's probably too late to think
of "diversity" and "tolerance."
- Confidentiality. Somebody talks about
somebody else behind that somebody else's back, and it
comes out in the open. Or, trying to know without needing
to know.
- Context. Especially, failure to see
or understand events and conversations in context.
- Criticism. Criticism is often not
welcome under the best of circumstances, but it is
especially prone to being given or received in anger.
- Extracurricular activities. Watch out
for sports leagues and romantic relationships. They can
make work fun while all is going well, but they can make
work a living hell when they're not.
- Money. Especially when you loan it,
borrow it, sell or buy. :-)
- Offensive surroundings. This typically
happens in sexual harassment situations, but you may find
it in any perceived deviation from some standard of behavior.
("Why do I do this while they get to do that?")
- Access to resources. "I need to use
the copy machine!"
It's possible to get angry without causing your own work
(and everyone else's) to suffer. But it's difficult. I can
only say that you must try not to make an enemy through
your arguments.
Results of conflict include
- poor morale
- poor motivation
- low productivity
- ill will/anger
- avoidance of direct negotiation (e.g. via manipulation,
sabotage, insults, irritability, sulking, and/or denial)
- more conflict
Kathy Simmons of Canada Life Assurance Company lists four
personality types and their approaches to workplace
conflict -- she argues that if you know in advance how
you handle conflict, you can plan ahead or even train
to deal with it.
- Avoidance. You avoid conflict
at all costs, but may resent others in secret. Consider
assertiveness training.
- Analyzing. You are calm and a good
listener, but may give in to keep the peace. Work on
clearly communicating your feelings.
- Assertive. You are skilled at
negotiation and look at conflict as a challenge. Work
on improving your listening skills.
- Aggressive. You like to have the
upper hand. You tend to overwhelm quieter individuals.
Work on softening your approach and listening to others.
If you are ever (un)fortunate enough to have to intervene
in a workplace conflict, here are steps to take:
- Get the warring parties under control
-- quickly. (It may be necessary to be stern and apply
rules.)
- Get each party's point of view, one
at a time.
- Facilitate an action plan between the
parties.
- Call a formal meeting. Schedule date, time, room.
- Show the warring parties no sympathy. Assign no blame.
- Ask no leading or "yes/no" questions.
- Address one problem at a time, the most immediate
or serious first.
- Get specific answers and sum them up often.
- Accept any steps toward resolution, however small.
- Put plans in writing; get parties to sign off.
The formality of this process makes them take it
seriously.
- Bring in the police if there is a threat of
violence. Don't play hero.
- Use the written agreement to control future
conflict.
- Control behavior.
- Eliminate situations and environmental influences
that can lead to conflict.
- Use incentives that benefit the entire group. Peer
mediation resulting from incentives can be effective.
Anger
People can become uncomfortable in the presence of anger.
This short-circuits the responses of anyone surrounding a
conflict, and might hinder contributed solutions as others
around the angry people "flee." Anger has also cost people
jobs and opportunities, because who wants to work alongside
an angry person?
Anger is an expression of passion; so is apathy. Even
though some things are broken by anger, some broken things
can't be fixed without passion. So can you channel passion
in a direction that fixes rather than breaks?
- Injustice: passion is needed to fix
unjust systems.
- Enemies: we can destroy our enemies by
making them our friends. What's the chance that our
enemies are just the result of an unjust system?
References
Potter, B.
From
Conflict to Cooperation. Berkeley: Ronin Publishing, 1996.
ISBN 0-914-17179-8
What You Can Do
- Maintain a log of "cause and effect."
When something happens that irritates you, rather than
letting yourself simmer over it, write it down. Write
down the event (cause) and your feelings about it (effect).
Allow yourself to "talk it through."
- Talk to someone about what's made you angry,
preferably outside of the workplace.
- Do not respond on the spot to the event that made
you angry. You'd be better off not to respond
in the workplace at all.
- Commit to take action based on what you've written
in your log. Remember that you only have control
over yourself.
- If you confront a co-worker over a conflict, be
non-judgmental. Name-calling or blame-throwing
will not help you. Apologize if necessary; offer to work
the issue through.
- If you have to correct a subordinate, do it right
away. Don't let something that's wrong stay wrong.
- Remember that all sides in a conflict are based
on assumptions. Try to figure out where
the assumptions come from.
- Remember that most arguments have more than two
sides. Never assume it's "us v. them."
- Remember that you might not know everything, and
keep an open mind. What if you really are
wrong?
- Remember that the person who disagrees with
you is a person!
On the Internet, your emotions are difficult to
capture. The Usenet community developed the
emoticon, or smiley, as an attempt to communicate
emotions in 2-D. But smileys are at best blunt
instruments for this, and more often than not
aren't used at all. The facial expressions,
posture, and changes in voice tone associated
with humor and sarcasm aren't there on your
computer screen, and that (combined with a world
that's unprepared for dealing with conflict) is
how "flame wars" start.
- Remember that conflict may not present itself
in one-on-one situations, where you can seek
clarification immediately. In public places
there are hecklers; in the media there are
letters to the editor; on the Internet there
are trolls and spelling flames. :-)
- Remember that criticism of a point you make
may not be intended personally, though you may
feel otherwise.
- When a conflict arises, ask yourself
- Is your argument worth a falling out with someone?
- Is the conflict the result of your argument or the
way you present it?
- Before you assume complete disagreement,
- Ask for clarification on stated points.
- Try to restate points in your own words.
- Seek the truth.
- Before you get angry,
- Remember that anger may make others uncomfortable.
Good ideas can be lost if you scare others away.
- Anger has cost people jobs and opportunities. Who
wants to work with an angry person?
|