|
Intellectual Property Ron Graham |
||||||||||||
|
Intellectual property is something you own but can't touch.
Registration of intellectual property provides a public record of the idea. This can be done in the US by
Company policies generally define boundaries between personal and company-related creativity. Though the policies are supposed to protect both you and the company, they generally protect the company much, much better. You may be forced to give your ideas over to the company, even if you come up with them substantially on your own time and with your own resources, if the company gives you even modest support (e.g. copier, telephone, Web searches, clerical assistance). There are two critical steps in obtaining a public record of your ideas: "reduction to practice" and application. Reduction to practice means to take the idea and make it tangible. This enables protection from (for instance) someone else making money from your idea. Record in a notebook, with dates and places
This detailed information separates your idea from similar concepts of other inventors. A patent application includes
...all of which goes to the USPTO. Publishing Related Inventions Sometimes companies will place incremental improvements to an existing invention in the public domain. Pending patents are tied up (and confidential) for at least 18 months, and innovation goes on. Any incremental changes to the design you've patented (or applied for a patent for) are not covered by the initial patent. A company may instead opt to place the improvements in the public domain, to keep anyone else from getting the patent on the improved invention.
A US patent allows idea protection for 17 years for a patent of "significance" (other than appearance). It takes about a year and a half to get. US courts can protect American inventors from exact copies but not similar products (though this is being challenged). An example of a dangerous patent claim is the amazon.com "One-Click Selling" patent, which some think may lead to further dangers:
Assignments I have heard readers complain that patenting impedes progress, due to the unavoidable heavy legal jargon written into a patent. Can you interpret this portion of a patent?
While the invention has been described in connection with several exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood that many modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art; and that this application is intended to cover an adaptations or variations thereof. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be only limited by the claims and the equivalents thereof. References
The sci.engr.* FAQ on
Innovation and Product Development What You Can Do
|
||||||||||||