Status of Issues in Governance 2007-2008
|
Issue/Charge |
Committee |
Status* and Link to Policy Text |
|
Continued from 2005-06 |
CSCC |
Step 2 |
|
|
CSCC |
Procedural recommendation made to The Office of Student Activities and Leadership Development and reflected in policy available at: http://www.tcnj.edu/~stuactiv/posting.php |
|
|
CAP |
Referred to Advising and Student Support Planning Council |
|
Undergraduate Students Taking Graduate Courses - Limit of Credits |
CAP |
|
|
Defining Minors |
CAP |
Current policy re-affirmed |
|
Double Counting for Minors in International Business and Art History |
CAP |
Step 3: CAP reaffirmed current policy and recommended against exceptions to the rule in these two cases.
|
|
Central Eurasian Studies Minor |
CAP |
Approved |
|
Student Feedback on Teaching (item #15-overall summary) |
CAP |
Will be included as part of the overall review of the Student Feedback on Teaching in Fall, 2008 |
|
Revision of Governance 2005 Document (Revised to indicate governance responsibilities for course scheduling grid, academic calendar, and Wednesday meeting schedule |
Steering |
|
|
Walking at graduation |
CAP |
Current policy re-affirmed |
|
CAP |
Current policy re-affirmed |
|
|
Review of class schedule grid |
CAP |
Step
2 |
|
CAP |
Approved |
|
|
Peer review of teaching |
CFA |
|
|
Use of external review |
CFA |
Step 1 |
|
Use of grade distributions (as follow up of 2007 Promotion and Reappointment Document) |
CFA |
Step 1 |
|
SOSA review |
CFA |
|
|
CFA |
Step 1 |
|
|
CAP |
||
|
Student Travel Policy |
CSCC |
Step 2 |
|
CFA |
||
|
CAP |
Incorporated in curricular and program change (above) |
|
|
Post-master's program for teachers of the blind and visually impaired and MAT option for teachers of the blind and visually impaired |
CAP |
Approved |
|
CAP |
||
|
CCIC |
Step 1 |
|
|
CAP |
Approved |
|
|
Quantitative Criminology Minor |
CAP |
Step 2 |
|
Discontinuation of Master's Programs in English and Applied Spanish |
CAP |
Last Updated: September 16, 2008
* Step #1 -- Identifying and reporting the problem: When
a Standing Committee receives an issue from the Steering Committee, the first
responsibility is to clearly articulate and report the problem to the campus
community through regular updates to the campus community and the Governance
Web Page (www.tcnj.edu/~steering
). The problem may have been set out
clearly in the charge received from the Steering Committee, or it may be
necessary for the Standing Committee to frame a problem statement. The problem statement should indicate the
difficulties or uncertainties that need to be addressed through new or revised
policy, procedure, or program. The
problem statement should be broadly stated and should include a context such as
existing policy or practice. Problem
statements may include solution parameters but should not suggest any actual
solutions. Clearly stated problems will
lead to better recommendations.
Step #2 -- Preparing
a preliminary recommendation: Once the campus community has received the problem
statement, committees can begin to collect data needed to make a
recommendation. Committees typically
receive input through committee membership, formal testimony, and open comment
from affected individuals and all stakeholder groups. Committees must be proactive in inviting
stakeholder groups (including Student Government Association, Staff Senate and
Faculty Senate) to provide formal testimony prior to developing a preliminary
recommendation. When, in the best
judgment of the committee, adequate clarity of the principles contributing to
the problem are known, a preliminary recommendation should be drafted and
disseminated to the campus community through regular updates and the Governance
Web Page.
Step #3 -- Making a
Final Recommendation: Committees must use sound judgment to give the campus
adequate time to review the preliminary recommendation before making their
final recommendation. Again, committees
are expected to be proactive in receiving feedback on the preliminary
recommendation. If a full calendar year
has passed since the formal announcement of the preliminary recommendation, the
committee must resubmit a preliminary recommendation to the campus community. When, in the best judgment of the committee,
the campus community has responded to the proposed resolution of the issue, the
committee shall send their final recommendation (complete documentation) to the
Steering Committee.
Testimony
The presenting of testimony is central to the concept of shared governance. All stakeholder groups will have an opportunity to provide input into governance issues through direct membership as well as invited testimony. Individuals appointed or elected to the governance system are expected to take a broad institutional perspective relative to issues being considered. In contrast, invited testimony will reflect the stakeholder perspective on the issue being considered. Committees are expected to be proactive in inviting stakeholder groups to provide testimony at both step # 2 and #3 of the process. Committees need to identify stakeholder groups that are interested in each particular issue and invite their testimony at scheduled Committee meetings or hearings. Committees should report in their minutes which groups were targeted as stakeholders, how testimony was invited, the form of the testimony (written, oral, etc.), and the substantive content of the testimony.