Status of Issues in
Governance 2009-2010
|
Issue/Charge |
Committee
|
Status*
and Link to Policy Text |
|
Student
travel policy Reactivated
from 2004-2005 |
CSCC |
|
|
Continued from
2007-08 |
CAP |
Referred
to Advising and Student Support Planning Council |
|
CAP |
Step
1 |
|
|
Continued
from 2007-8 |
CAP |
|
|
Five-Year review of tenured faculty Continued from
2007-08 |
CFA |
|
|
Involuntary Withdrawal for Health or Safety Reasons Review
of previously approved policy |
CSCC |
|
|
CAP |
||
|
CAP |
||
|
Academic Load (student overload) |
CAP |
Step
1 |
|
Modifications/Clarifications to the Reappointment, Tenure, and Promotion Document Includes Interdisciplinary standards, incomplete materials, etc. |
CFA |
Cover memo on interdisciplinary standards Cover memo on revised document
|
|
CAP |
||
|
Interdisciplinary Standards (for reappointment, tenure, and
promotion) |
CFA |
|
|
CAP |
||
|
CAP |
||
|
CAP |
||
|
CPP |
||
|
CAP |
||
|
CPP |
Step 1 |
|
|
CFA |
||
|
CAP |
|
|
|
CAP |
Step 1 |
|
|
CAP |
||
|
Handling applications submitted by SOSA and Sabbatical
Committee members |
CFA |
|
|
GPC via CAP |
Step 1 |
|
|
CFA |
||
|
CAP |
||
|
CSCC |
Step 1 |
|
|
CPP |
||
|
a. Proposed program closures-School of Nursing, Health,
and Exercise Science |
GPC/CAP |
Step 3 |
|
Conversion of engineering specialty to BS in biomedical
engineering |
CAP |
Approved through governance. Still requires Board of Trustees and State approval. |
End of
year committee reports:
Last Updated: September 29,
2010
Step #1 -- Identifying
and reporting the problem: When a Standing Committee receives an issue
from the Steering Committee, the first responsibility is to clearly articulate and
report the problem to the campus community through regular updates to the
campus community and the Governance Web Page (www.tcnj.edu/~steering
). The problem may have been set out clearly in the charge received from
the Steering Committee, or it may be necessary for the Standing Committee to
frame a problem statement. The problem statement should indicate the
difficulties or uncertainties that need to be addressed through new or revised
policy, procedure, or program. The problem statement should be broadly
stated and should include a context such as existing policy or practice.
Problem statements may include solution parameters but should not suggest any
actual solutions. Clearly stated problems will lead to better
recommendations.
Step #2 -- Preparing a
preliminary recommendation: Once the campus community has received the
problem statement, committees can begin to collect data needed to make a
recommendation. Committees typically receive input through committee
membership, formal testimony, and open comment from affected individuals and
all stakeholder groups. Committees must be proactive in inviting
stakeholder groups (including Student Government Association, Staff Senate and
Faculty Senate) to provide formal testimony prior to developing a preliminary
recommendation. When, in the best judgment of the committee, adequate
clarity of the principles contributing to the problem are known, a preliminary
recommendation should be drafted and disseminated to the campus community
through regular updates and the Governance Web Page.
Step #3 -- Making a Final
Recommendation: Committees must use sound judgment to give the campus
adequate time to review the preliminary recommendation before making their final
recommendation. Again, committees are expected to be proactive in
receiving feedback on the preliminary recommendation. If a full calendar
year has passed since the formal announcement of the preliminary
recommendation, the committee must resubmit a preliminary recommendation to the
campus community. When, in the best judgment of the committee, the campus
community has responded to the proposed resolution of the issue, the committee
shall send their final recommendation (complete documentation) to the Steering
Committee.
Testimony
The presenting of testimony is central to the concept of shared
governance. All stakeholder groups will have an opportunity to provide
input into governance issues through direct membership as well as invited
testimony. Individuals appointed or elected to the governance system are
expected to take a broad institutional perspective relative to issues being
considered. In contrast, invited testimony will reflect the stakeholder
perspective on the issue being considered. Committees are expected to be
proactive in inviting stakeholder groups to provide testimony at both step # 2
and #3 of the process. Committees need to identify stakeholder groups
that are interested in each particular issue and invite their testimony at
scheduled Committee meetings or hearings. Committees should report in
their minutes which groups were targeted as stakeholders, how testimony was
invited, the form of the testimony (written, oral, etc.), and the substantive
content of the testimony.